Gholamreza Esmaeeli azar; Baqer Shamlou; Keyoumars Kalantary
Abstract
In the present age, with the increasing growth of new science and technologies, fundamental changes in values and norms, and the multiplicity and entanglement of social and political systems; The nature, form, variety and manner of committing crimes have also changed a lot. Given that crime emerges in ...
Read More
In the present age, with the increasing growth of new science and technologies, fundamental changes in values and norms, and the multiplicity and entanglement of social and political systems; The nature, form, variety and manner of committing crimes have also changed a lot. Given that crime emerges in the context of social conditions, in this study, in an interdisciplinary study between criminology and strategic sciences with a "descriptive-analytical" method and using the criterion of modern social classification, we seek to divide Present a new classification of crimes in accordance with the complex conditions mentioned above. According to the achievements of this study, unlike the major classification system, inspired by the model of "community management system in modern perception" as well as strategic science data, crimes in three new levels: 1- Strategic or imaginary-paradigm crimes ; 2- We have classified tactological or managerial crimes and 3- technological or individual and technological crimes. In this regard, contrary to the common perception in the alloying of crimes into Micro and Macro crimes, this research in the new alloy, crimes in four layers Nano, Micro, Macro And Super is divided according to the two criteria of Sibel or the target environment of the crime and on the other hand the damages. Finally, by combining the above topics, in a matrix structure, a new classification of crimes in the form of a doctrine can be achieved, which in this research is referred to as "crime Rating ".
kiomarth Kalantari; reza hadizadeh
Abstract
This article deals with the murder in the law of Iran and England. In the law of Iran and England respectively according to Section 375 of Islamic Criminal Act and “Howe” case, duress defense isn’t available in murder. Accordingly, if someone wants from a person to commit murder by ...
Read More
This article deals with the murder in the law of Iran and England. In the law of Iran and England respectively according to Section 375 of Islamic Criminal Act and “Howe” case, duress defense isn’t available in murder. Accordingly, if someone wants from a person to commit murder by threatening him with murder, there is no possibility of resorting to duress defense in laws of Iran and England; However duress to murder may be in various forms such as "duress to grievous bodily harm that leads to murder", "preserving more people by committing murder", "specific circumstances of the person being threatened" and " impending death of the victim". In these cases, duress seems to be accepted in Iranian law. The British law approach is in some ways stricter than the position of Iranian law; because in this country, although considering the case of conjoined twins, it is possible to accept duress defense in some instances where the death of the victim is imminent; However, in English law, in contrast to Iranian law, duress defense in other cases such as duress to kill one person in order to save several people is unacceptable.
Abstract
Emersion of industrial revolution in 19th century A.D, besides economic evolutions of advanced societies, has been accompanied with change or amendment of some current institutes and notions of criminal law. Among these fundamental changes is this fact that about new crimes due to mechanized life, there ...
Read More
Emersion of industrial revolution in 19th century A.D, besides economic evolutions of advanced societies, has been accompanied with change or amendment of some current institutes and notions of criminal law. Among these fundamental changes is this fact that about new crimes due to mechanized life, there is no need to mental element attaining ( subjective interaction), but standard individual behavior is evaluated regardless of delinquent personal features. This theory called typical fault. This paper seeks to examine this issue in criminology perspective and to analyze selection of standard behavior pattern by focusing on theoretical approach of rational selection and through this criminological realization, express the impact of fault basis change in preventing from unintentional crimes incidence or reduction of its severity along with providing its limitations.aaaa preventing from unintentional crimes incidence or reduction of its severity along with providing its limitations.reventing from unintentional crimes incidence or unintentional crimes incidence or
behroz gholizadeh
Abstract
According to art.492 IPC, the crime leads to Qisas or Diya when there is a causal relationship between committed behavior and resulted crime. One of the factors which cuts the chain of causation in the murder is the victim's behavior. The victim can diminish causal relation by "deliberate, consciously ...
Read More
According to art.492 IPC, the crime leads to Qisas or Diya when there is a causal relationship between committed behavior and resulted crime. One of the factors which cuts the chain of causation in the murder is the victim's behavior. The victim can diminish causal relation by "deliberate, consciously or unconsciously" behavior which may be in some cases by omission. However, in some cases, perpetrator's intent is so extensive that the victim's behavior will have no effect on the assignment of crime to him. There are some questions here; what is the victim's behavior effect on the causal relation in murder? What is the effect of perpetrator's intent in the assignment of murder?In this paper, by using descriptive-analytical approach alongside studying the causality relationship between perpetrator behavior and the result of that behavior in murder, the effects of victims behavior on occurrence murder will be studied, and the related questions will be answered by resorting to legal principles and jurisprudence.
kiomars kalantari; FARSHAD SHIRZADI FAR
Volume 3, Issue 10 , April 2015, , Pages 41-63
Abstract
Abstract Credit of foreign court sentences means a sentence issued by foreign courts including (international and domestic courts of countries) against public crimes with the credit of universal jurisdiction based on the positive conflict of jurisdiction whether according to conviction or acquittal. ...
Read More
Abstract Credit of foreign court sentences means a sentence issued by foreign courts including (international and domestic courts of countries) against public crimes with the credit of universal jurisdiction based on the positive conflict of jurisdiction whether according to conviction or acquittal. If universal jurisdiction is concerned about a crime, even though that crime have a punishment (Moharebeh or corruption on earth), our country`s courts do not have the right to address the issue again. However, when an Iranian who has committed a universal crime while was investigated and punished by a foreign court, if this person is found in Iran, with respect to personal jurisdiction, Iranian courts can investigate him. Also, a person with a universal crime can escape punishment by relying on his ignorance of some crimes or his ignorance of the subject. It seems that, in the case of acceptance of non-validity of Iranian's courts about universal jurisdiction if the committed crime has been subject to punishment and the person has withstood the sentence outside Iran, and that sentence is not compatible with Shriah concepts such as lack of forgetting punishments, but with respect to international interest, this problem can be solved by depending on alternative sentences.
